Restraining order requests more
than double in 5 years
GREENVILLE, S.C. (AP) - The number of requests for emergency restraining orders has
more than doubled in the last five years, and some law officials wonder if the protective
orders aren't being misused. ''Not only are they not emergencies, they're not domestic
abuse. A lot of times it's just people yah-yahing about various things,'' said Family
Court Judge R. Kinard Johnson. ''It's just two people who are physically aggressive with
each other. They really don't need to bring an action under that law.''
Johnson said some lawyers are using the order hearings in place of pretrial divorce
hearings in attempts to get the judge to decide issues such as temporary child custody,
child support and alimony.
According to court records, the number of protective orders requested jumped from 263
in 1992 to 664 last year. About nine out of 10 of those are made by women.
''It's being abused by women, not only for obtaining orders of protection against
domestic violence but also for bringing criminal charges against men,'' said Efia
Nwangaza, a Greenville Family Court lawyer who lobbied the Legislature for the orders.
''I am particularly perturbed toward women who use it as mechanisms for control,
revenge and manipulation,'' she said.
South Carolina allows a person to request a restraining order in Family Court if the
person has been abused or threatened by a spouse, former spouse, household member,
relative or parent.
The requests are given emergency status and the two parties appear before a judge
without lawyers. The order, which can include custody or money decisions, can last up to
one year.
''It's the quickest way to get in the court for anything,'' said Robin Beckham, the
victim witness advocate who runs Greenville's protective order program. ''Some attorneys,
not all, use it as a way to get around having their temporary (pretrial) hearing.''
Beckham said she is frustrated with people who are not in a crisis situation but use
the process anyway.
''We've got people who have a spat, and they'll come and file, and the very next day
they call and say, 'I want to dismiss it,''' she said.
While she tries to screen applicant, Beckham said she does not deny a person's right to
file. ''We'd much rather be safe than sorry,'' she said.
''People who come down whose cases are not that serious still need help and
intervention,'' said Family Court Judge Amy Sutherland. ''Potentially, it could get a lot
worse.''
Yet, Sutherland said she sees cases that allege domestic violence but are really about
getting custody of the children or the home before divorce papers are filed. |